Those of you who have experimented with different sized tires from 235's to 31's.
What have you come to the conclusion on fuel consumption ?
Highway vs. city vs. off road
Aside from looks, is the ratio (RPM) difference on the highway between 30's and 31's significant enough and does it offset the higher fuel consumption ?
Looking for real off/on road readings.
Jesse
upgrading to 31" tires. fuel consumption verdict
- patty
- Posts: 713
- Joined: Sat Jun 16, 2007 1:45 pm
- Member's Photo Album: http://www.delica.ca/Photos/
- Vehicle: delica chamonix
- Location: Whistler/Prince George
Re: upgrading to 31" tires. fuel consumption verdict
i dont got any numbers for yeahz.i would say that if your in the city all the time i wouldnt go bigger (31) cozz its hard to get up to a decent speed, and when your playing red light green light in heavey traffic it gets very frustrating. though when driving highway all the time (like myself) i find once you get up to speed you hold the speed.
- jessef
- Posts: 6459
- Joined: Tue Feb 26, 2008 1:27 pm
- Vehicle: JDM flavour of the month
- Location: Vancouver
- Location: Vancouver, BC
Re: upgrading to 31" tires. fuel consumption verdict
Thanks Patty.
I'm looking specifically for fuel consumption.
The major difference between the 30-31's is the extra meat/width that's kissing the concrete.
Delica's have different gear ratio's than some of Pajero's (mine had 5.29's tractor gears) and I had to go up in diameter to compensate for the RPM's on the highway. But fuel mileage suffered.
Same deal on the Delica's with you guys running 31's ?
Jesse
I'm looking specifically for fuel consumption.
The major difference between the 30-31's is the extra meat/width that's kissing the concrete.
Delica's have different gear ratio's than some of Pajero's (mine had 5.29's tractor gears) and I had to go up in diameter to compensate for the RPM's on the highway. But fuel mileage suffered.
Same deal on the Delica's with you guys running 31's ?
Jesse
- delicat
- Posts: 2331
- Joined: Thu Jul 26, 2007 6:26 pm
- Member's Photo Album: http://www.delica.ca/Photos/
- Vehicle: '92 Exeed '93 Safari '94 Pajero
- Location: New Westminster, BC
- Location: New Westminster, BC
Re: upgrading to 31" tires. fuel consumption verdict
Jesse
Check Josh's link:
http://www.delica.ca/forum/whirlwind-tr ... light=tree
"Yes I did put on the 31's... it helps dramatically with my fuel mileage on the manual (on the auto it made the fuel mileage drop)."
Cheers,
David
Check Josh's link:
http://www.delica.ca/forum/whirlwind-tr ... light=tree
"Yes I did put on the 31's... it helps dramatically with my fuel mileage on the manual (on the auto it made the fuel mileage drop)."
Cheers,
David
'93 Nissan Patrol
'94 Mitsubishi Pajero

"If it ain't broken, modify it!"
'94 Mitsubishi Pajero

"If it ain't broken, modify it!"
-
- Posts: 868
- Joined: Mon Jul 24, 2006 8:44 pm
- Member's Photo Album: http://www.delica.ca/Photos/
- Vehicle: L300 poptop gasser
- Location: Vancouver, bC
- Location: Vancouver, BC
Re: upgrading to 31" tires. fuel consumption verdict
I think I may have overstated the "helps dramatically with my fuel mileage" statement. I think it helped a touch, but more importantly it lowered my RPM. I think if you went up to 31's but were able to stay narrower (like a 9.5) that it would help even more. In the end, usually bigger tires are a bigger expense all around... if you break even be thrilled.delicat wrote:Jesse
Check Josh's link:
http://www.delica.ca/forum/whirlwind-tr ... light=tree
"Yes I did put on the 31's... it helps dramatically with my fuel mileage on the manual (on the auto it made the fuel mileage drop)."
Cheers,
David
Josh