Page 2 of 2
Re: legality of rear facing seats
Posted: Sun May 02, 2010 12:30 pm
by glenn
I agree with your points, and suspect you interpretation of the "answer" from ICBC is right - no liability in saying no. And I don't buy the "rear end collisions are more common" argument either, for the simple reason that for the most part, the vehicle you are in normally has forward momentum, and a lot of kinetic energy, all of which has to go somewhere. And accidents don't only occur between two vehicles, but sometimes with stationary objects.
I take a "do so at your own risk" approach to my middle seats.
Re: legality of rear facing seats
Posted: Sun May 02, 2010 1:54 pm
by thedjjack
For every rear ended collision on car is going forward! Unless you are backing up and you tend to do that slowly!
Re: legality of rear facing seats
Posted: Tue May 11, 2010 11:24 am
by Firesong
Just for the record and it might have been said already but
Sitting backwards isn't any safer than sitting frontwards
in relation to impact. Accidents generally have some side-to-side
twist etc to them. And the big impact for a major type of
injury is whiplash. It's not the initial jerk that gets you,
it's the recoil back and then the opposite direction.
You would still get this with a chair facing the other way.
Years as a RMT doing lots of accident related injuries for
SGI etc etc have shown me lots of strange and interesting things.
So for the record. Try to avoid accidents ;)
Firesong RMT ;)