Thank you, and in this case it was aimed in a positive direction...RichD wrote:Actually it kinda does.nxski wrote: I may be younger than you and not as experienced in certain aspects but that doesn't mean that what I have to say lacks credibility
Your enthusiasm is great, when you aim it in the positive direction.
(note that I avoided insulting you because it's not productive and is not aimed in a positive direction)
EDIT:
"Even though it is physically impossible, I insist on parking in spots that are only 2" longer than my vehicle and I could not possibly imagine parking in a larger spot. THEREFORE your tire carrier is implicitly crap. /smiley" <-- useless drivel and sure to drag the thread away from where the OP was hoping it would go. trollish even"
This is definitely not what I said. The parking spots I park in are in busy crowded areas so typically if I want to find one they are small and I need as short of a vehicle as possible to get into them. Therefore, for me, the tire carrier would not be a good solution especially since I have lots of space on the roof for carrying cargo. I already stated that I like the clean simple design of the tire carrier and that it looks great. Why you need to find every reason to attack me is a mystery but I think you might want to take a pill for now and if you feel like arguing show up to the next meet and do it there instead of bothering the people on this forum with your dribble.
Thanks