Re: "Even posties have to drive on the right"
Posted: Mon Feb 02, 2009 7:44 pm
A recent article in the upcoming issue of Macleans made me shake my head at how Canada Post is spending our tax dollars to provide ... well ... "service".
Anyway, it seems a few years back Canada Post spent 500-million dollars to figure out how to get its posties on the rural roads to stay on the right side of the road. It seems some of them would cross the line so they could deposit mail into the boxes without having to leave the comfort of their seat. And when one of them complained that Canada Post couldn't have them perform "dangerous work," it set off a study to determine how to 'fix' rural delivery. It seems the postie in question felt that parking on the right side of the road, getting out of the vehicle and crossing the road was somehow MORE dangerous than driving down the left-side of the road into on-coming traffic!
Anyway, I sent the following comments to Macleans:
I would have thought a more obvious answer to letting posties remain in the driver's seat and put mail into the mailbox on the side of a rural road was to have them drive on the right - the right-hand side of the vehicle, that is. I can remember a time when rural postal trucks were right-hand drive (RHD), and it seemed to make sense, all those years ago. Always wondered why Canada Post stopped using RHD vehicles.
Instead, this wastrel company spent half-a-billion of my tax dollars to figure out how to get drivers like Ms. Pollard to obey the rules of the road, or how to develop training for ergonomically-viable ways to reach across 1.5m of vehicle, out an open window, into the mailbox.
If Canada Post is wondering where it can get RHD vehicles, might I suggest: Ford, Chevrolet, and GM (yes, they all make RHD variants), or they could start importing RHD from one of the left-side-of-the-road driving countries (England or Japan or Australia to name a few). There currently many RHDs driving around on Canadian streets: one is the garbage truck for my street (and that driver is standing-up too); one is the sweeper truck that drives around my neighbourhood (actually its got two steering wheels, one on either side of the vehicle, as does the garbage truck); and the Saskatoon Bylaw Enforcement officers are driving around in imported RHD Mitsubishi Pajeros (reportedly purchased for driver's safety). Even the United States Postal Service uses RHD vehicles - maybe Canada Post could ask them where they got all those vehicles...
The federal government was asking why Canada Post doesn't purchase RHD vehicles: see the House of Commons debate for the 23 October 2006.
I wanted to write more, but if I had any hope of getting it published in the next issue, I had to keep it short.
Thoughts?
Anyway, it seems a few years back Canada Post spent 500-million dollars to figure out how to get its posties on the rural roads to stay on the right side of the road. It seems some of them would cross the line so they could deposit mail into the boxes without having to leave the comfort of their seat. And when one of them complained that Canada Post couldn't have them perform "dangerous work," it set off a study to determine how to 'fix' rural delivery. It seems the postie in question felt that parking on the right side of the road, getting out of the vehicle and crossing the road was somehow MORE dangerous than driving down the left-side of the road into on-coming traffic!
Anyway, I sent the following comments to Macleans:
I would have thought a more obvious answer to letting posties remain in the driver's seat and put mail into the mailbox on the side of a rural road was to have them drive on the right - the right-hand side of the vehicle, that is. I can remember a time when rural postal trucks were right-hand drive (RHD), and it seemed to make sense, all those years ago. Always wondered why Canada Post stopped using RHD vehicles.
Instead, this wastrel company spent half-a-billion of my tax dollars to figure out how to get drivers like Ms. Pollard to obey the rules of the road, or how to develop training for ergonomically-viable ways to reach across 1.5m of vehicle, out an open window, into the mailbox.
If Canada Post is wondering where it can get RHD vehicles, might I suggest: Ford, Chevrolet, and GM (yes, they all make RHD variants), or they could start importing RHD from one of the left-side-of-the-road driving countries (England or Japan or Australia to name a few). There currently many RHDs driving around on Canadian streets: one is the garbage truck for my street (and that driver is standing-up too); one is the sweeper truck that drives around my neighbourhood (actually its got two steering wheels, one on either side of the vehicle, as does the garbage truck); and the Saskatoon Bylaw Enforcement officers are driving around in imported RHD Mitsubishi Pajeros (reportedly purchased for driver's safety). Even the United States Postal Service uses RHD vehicles - maybe Canada Post could ask them where they got all those vehicles...
The federal government was asking why Canada Post doesn't purchase RHD vehicles: see the House of Commons debate for the 23 October 2006.
I wanted to write more, but if I had any hope of getting it published in the next issue, I had to keep it short.
Thoughts?