Revisiting old diesel technology and applying new thinking
Posted: Wed Dec 15, 2010 10:19 pm
by jaggedfish
Hey all!
Slightly off Delica topic but it does have to do with diesel engines. This info came across my desk the other day and am curious what everyone has to say or think about this. Much smaller motor, much greater horsepower and big torque. This is a 2-stroke diesel, opposing piston, opposing cylinder motor generating about 300 horsepower out of a 300 pound motor. BMW has taken some old technology and is redeveloping this. I think it sounds pretty cool. Here's the links that were sent to me by another car guy at my office...
Re: Revisiting old diesel technology and applying new thinking
Posted: Wed Dec 15, 2010 10:22 pm
by konadog
When I started working at the city here in Campbell River they had an old bucket truck that was a 2-stroke diesel - Drove it a number of times. Pretty cool.
Re: Revisiting old diesel technology and applying new thinking
Posted: Wed Dec 15, 2010 10:30 pm
by RichD
Very cool. I'd like to see a BMW style bike with this kind of engine.
Re: Revisiting old diesel technology and applying new thinking
Posted: Thu Dec 16, 2010 12:05 am
by FalcoColumbarius
I would think that this engine would be extremely fuel efficient, too ~ I think that is often a concern when going into the bush for longer periods of time (not to mention deep into the enemy's territory as this is what it's initially being designed for). Although I am curious as to why they are using electricity to aid the turbos.
Falco.
Re: Revisiting old diesel technology and applying new thinking
Posted: Thu Dec 16, 2010 1:58 am
by Mr. Flibble
FalcoColumbarius wrote:I would think that this engine would be extremely fuel efficient, too ~ I think that is often a concern when going into the bush for longer periods of time (not to mention deep into the enemy's territory as this is what it's initially being designed for). Although I am curious as to why they are using electricity to aid the turbos.
Falco.
The electricity to the turbo allows for better gas scavenging from the cylinders. This helps to give the 2 stroke comparable levels of gas scavenging to a 4 stroke.
Re: Revisiting old diesel technology and applying new thinking
Posted: Thu Dec 16, 2010 8:23 am
by mararmeisto
I met a couple who lived in a bus and it was a 2-stroke diesel in the back. Bus was from the '60s or '70s and they said it was quite common for its time.
Re: Revisiting old diesel technology and applying new thinking
Posted: Thu Dec 16, 2010 9:26 am
by DeliTan
mararmeisto wrote:I met a couple who lived in a bus and it was a 2-stroke diesel in the back. Bus was from the '60s or '70s and they said it was quite common for its time.
I also have such a bus. It's a 1967 ex "greyhound" 35 feet long with a pusher 8V71 Detroit Diesel 2 stroke. Best guess is it has 2.2 million miles on it
The engine is good for 500,000 miles before needing a rebuild which puts it in new condition.
It seems to surprise people who know this engine that I only "loose" 7 gal of oil per Mexico trip and get 10 miles per imperial gal. Not bad for a 12.5 ton motorhome.
john
Re: Revisiting old diesel technology and applying new thinking
Posted: Thu Dec 16, 2010 11:05 am
by DelicaDJ
DeliTan wrote:
mararmeisto wrote:I met a couple who lived in a bus and it was a 2-stroke diesel in the back. Bus was from the '60s or '70s and they said it was quite common for its time.
I also have such a bus. It's a 1967 ex "greyhound" 35 feet long with a pusher 8V71 Detroit Diesel 2 stroke. Best guess is it has 2.2 million miles on it
The engine is good for 500,000 miles before needing a rebuild which puts it in new condition.
It seems to surprise people who know this engine that I only "loose" 7 gal of oil per Mexico trip and get 10 miles per imperial gal. Not bad for a 12.5 ton motorhome.
john
Nice bus there, DeliTan! Are you losing that oil into the engine, or onto the road?
Re: Revisiting old diesel technology and applying new thinking
Posted: Thu Dec 16, 2010 11:34 am
by FalcoColumbarius
Mr. Flibble wrote:
FalcoColumbarius wrote:I would think that this engine would be extremely fuel efficient, too ~ I think that is often a concern when going into the bush for longer periods of time (not to mention deep into the enemy's territory as this is what it's initially being designed for). Although I am curious as to why they are using electricity to aid the turbos.
Falco.
The electricity to the turbo allows for better gas scavenging from the cylinders. This helps to give the 2 stroke comparable levels of gas scavenging to a 4 stroke.
So you're saying that because it's a two cylinder it doesn't develop enough exhaust to spin the turbo and that's why the electrical aide is there?
Re: Revisiting old diesel technology and applying new thinking
Posted: Thu Dec 16, 2010 11:57 am
by DeliTan
[/quote]
Nice bus there, DeliTan! Are you losing that oil into the engine, or onto the road? [/quote]
Thanx.
Most of it gets eaten and is normal. However, the nicknames of that engine are "The Green Leaker" or Driptoid Diesel.
I chose the bus model because its mostly stainless and the engine due to its simplicity...
I would change the engine for an OPOC as soon as it, too, has 55 years reliability under its belt
Re: Revisiting old diesel technology and applying new thinking
Posted: Thu Dec 16, 2010 12:28 pm
by jaggedfish
RichD wrote:Very cool. I'd like to see a BMW style bike with this kind of engine.
That was the first thing we said in the office here too - would make an intersting custom too
Funny that DeliTan actually owns a bus with a 2-stroke - nice one by-the-way! It will be interesting to see where BMW applies this in the long run... gone may be the days where the gasoline motor dominates the sports car world. A compact and lightweight 300hp motor would fit in a pretty small car... add veg to the equation and you would have a new eco-supercar...
Re: Revisiting old diesel technology and applying new thinking
Posted: Fri Dec 17, 2010 12:10 pm
by marsgal42
My picks for most exciting sounding engines. None of them are new, but one of them is a two-stoke diesel.