I have a small leak in my two part fill hose. I want to replace it, but have not yet found a hose with enough flex to alow sufficient turn radium without crimping the hose.
Any suggestions???
Better 1.5" fuel fill hose needed
Moderator: BCDelica
- steepcreeker
- Posts: 50
- Joined: Tue Jun 19, 2007 2:49 pm
- Member's Photo Album: http://www.delica.ca/Photos/
- Vehicle: 94 Royal L400
- after oil
- Posts: 1436
- Joined: Mon Feb 11, 2008 7:01 pm
- Member's Photo Album: http://www.delica.ca/Photos/
- Vehicle: 92 cham-reimo poptop L300. 78MB240D
- Location: on the road
- Location: occupied coast salish territory aka powell river
Re: Better 1.5" fuel fill hose needed
what degree of bend do you need?
i went to a marine store for 1 1/2" hose. its a buck an inch and it flexes past 45 but not to 90. its steel reinforced.
i went to a marine store for 1 1/2" hose. its a buck an inch and it flexes past 45 but not to 90. its steel reinforced.
- steepcreeker
- Posts: 50
- Joined: Tue Jun 19, 2007 2:49 pm
- Member's Photo Album: http://www.delica.ca/Photos/
- Vehicle: 94 Royal L400
Re: Better 1.5" fuel fill hose needed
Yeah, I need prity close to 90 Deg. What is the name of your hose?
Hey thanks again for the WVO when I visited Powell River. That fill set me up for the fall with a balanced volume in and out. So SUPER appreciated!
Hey thanks again for the WVO when I visited Powell River. That fill set me up for the fall with a balanced volume in and out. So SUPER appreciated!
- delicat
- Posts: 2331
- Joined: Thu Jul 26, 2007 6:26 pm
- Member's Photo Album: http://www.delica.ca/Photos/
- Vehicle: '92 Exeed '93 Safari '94 Pajero
- Location: New Westminster, BC
- Location: New Westminster, BC
Re: Better 1.5" fuel fill hose needed
Two options coming from the marine stores.
First one is the 1 1/2" fuel rated. It's very stiff and hard to work with.
The second option is the 1 1/2" sanitary hose. Looks very similar but it's softer hence easier to work with, bends more easily... I don't see a problem using the sanitary one with veggie oil, it's still very thick.
Jay aka Tardisdeli will have more information if needed.
Good luck,
David
First one is the 1 1/2" fuel rated. It's very stiff and hard to work with.
The second option is the 1 1/2" sanitary hose. Looks very similar but it's softer hence easier to work with, bends more easily... I don't see a problem using the sanitary one with veggie oil, it's still very thick.
Jay aka Tardisdeli will have more information if needed.
Good luck,
David
'93 Nissan Patrol
'94 Mitsubishi Pajero

"If it ain't broken, modify it!"
'94 Mitsubishi Pajero

"If it ain't broken, modify it!"
- after oil
- Posts: 1436
- Joined: Mon Feb 11, 2008 7:01 pm
- Member's Photo Album: http://www.delica.ca/Photos/
- Vehicle: 92 cham-reimo poptop L300. 78MB240D
- Location: on the road
- Location: occupied coast salish territory aka powell river
Re: Better 1.5" fuel fill hose needed
why not use a steel or plastic 90 elbow?
-
- Posts: 81
- Joined: Fri May 23, 2008 5:20 pm
- Member's Photo Album: http://www.delica.ca/Photos/
- Vehicle: toyota surf TD
Re: Better 1.5" fuel fill hose needed
go to lordco and have a look at the rad hoses in the back. Find one that is formed to 90* and make sure it is 1-1/2" ID.after oil wrote:why not use a steel or plastic 90 elbow?
- steepcreeker
- Posts: 50
- Joined: Tue Jun 19, 2007 2:49 pm
- Member's Photo Album: http://www.delica.ca/Photos/
- Vehicle: 94 Royal L400
Re: Better 1.5" fuel fill hose needed
I am using fuel hose. I also have a 90 deg elbow right now and this is the leaking problem. I already tried the 1.5 elbow in mufler stock but found that the hose did not even come close to fitting over it.
I tried the more flexible clear hose and it still bent and started crimping, but was able to do a better radius than the fuel hose.
I tried the more flexible clear hose and it still bent and started crimping, but was able to do a better radius than the fuel hose.