FalcoColumbarius wrote:Umm, just a minute. Are you talking about adjusting the boost or the IP?
The problem with altitude is that there is less air, as a result, all other thing being equal, your fuel mixture will be too rich. To adjust for higher altitude you need one of 2 things, either more boost, or less fuel. Either one will solve the problem (more boost gives you more air, leaning out the mixture, or less fuel also leans out the mixture),
Manitoba Deli is arguing that the turbo magically makes more boost forever more no matter how high you go, and therefore no fuel adjustment is needed.
I'm stating that the turbo isn't magical, it can only give so much boost, and as such, at altitude you need to reduce the amount of fuel used.
(In aircraft they actually use the "increase boost" method, by having a turbo that isn't in use at sea level, and they use more and more of it as the plane gains altitude, but that is a far cry from an automotive system where people use all the boost at sea level and there's no "more" to use when you get higher up)
As far as elevation coloured lines I would think that would work similar to the red lines on a tachometer. There is probably an "optimum" elevation, an "approaching dangerous" elevation and a "definitely not good" elevation, with a lot of greyness in between. So who has the exact numbers? I am reading a Mitsubishi Owners manual at the moment, perhaps it has something in there
And here you are probably correct, but what they mean by "dangerous" is a completely different question. My owner's manual certainly didn't mention anything, but if you find something let us know. (I think the "redline" was at 2000m if I recall? (if 2000 is 'dangerous' then I would think 1000-1500 would be "not as optimal as sea level"))