The mileage I get out of my van is brutal. Its a L300 Exceed. I am getting about 550km per tank.
Is this what I should expect. A mechanic suggested that the pumps are dirty and that they need to be cleaned in order to get better mileage. Should I go ahead with this $500 ordeal or just suck it up.
Also does anyone know a mechanic in Pemberton or near by.
fuel economy
-
- Posts: 2
- Joined: Wed Aug 18, 2010 5:36 pm
- Member's Photo Album: http://www.delica.ca/Photos/
- Vehicle: mitsubishi delica
- thedjjack
- Posts: 2025
- Joined: Wed Jan 27, 2010 12:13 am
- Member's Photo Album: ucp.php?i=164
- Vehicle: 1989 L300 HITOP!!
- Location: Port McNeill
- Location: Port McNeill
- Contact:
Re: fuel economy
I getting 9.5L/100km 1989 5speed (Speedo is under reporting due to 31s).
I assume you are automatic (bigger fuel tank).
You need to actually calculate your mileage.
550km sounds good but my tank is way smaller (I have 400km/tank).
I assume you are automatic (bigger fuel tank).
You need to actually calculate your mileage.
550km sounds good but my tank is way smaller (I have 400km/tank).
- jessef
- Posts: 6459
- Joined: Tue Feb 26, 2008 1:27 pm
- Vehicle: JDM flavour of the month
- Location: Vancouver
- Location: Vancouver, BC
Re: fuel economy
550 km's per tank is good or bad depending on how much fuel you put in.
Without knowing that, your assumption that you are getting poor fuel economy may be shortsighted.
With that said, average fuel economy for an L300 is 10-12L/100km
The tank is 75 liters but rarely would you put it more than 60L.
If you are filling up for 60-65 liters and getting 550km per tank then you're getting average.
Also depends on where you drive (highway/flat/hills/city....) and how you drive (conservative or peddle to the floor).
On the average 550km per tank is normal.
Driving between pemberton and whistler, you can get around 400-450km per tank.
Keep in mind the L300 is heavy, shaped like a brick and the motor is somewhat underpowered on hills.
Without knowing that, your assumption that you are getting poor fuel economy may be shortsighted.
With that said, average fuel economy for an L300 is 10-12L/100km
The tank is 75 liters but rarely would you put it more than 60L.
If you are filling up for 60-65 liters and getting 550km per tank then you're getting average.
Also depends on where you drive (highway/flat/hills/city....) and how you drive (conservative or peddle to the floor).
On the average 550km per tank is normal.
Driving between pemberton and whistler, you can get around 400-450km per tank.
Keep in mind the L300 is heavy, shaped like a brick and the motor is somewhat underpowered on hills.
- mararmeisto
- Posts: 3276
- Joined: Wed Sep 19, 2007 10:00 am
- Vehicle: 2018 Ram EcoDiesel
- Location: Dartmouth, NS
Re: fuel economy
For a 2-tonne, 4WD, brick-shaped bus, 550km is pretty good. I hope you didn't buy your van from some clown who told you it was going to get 25-30mpg!
Agree with jfarsang: if you're putting in less-than or about 60 litres per fill-up, and you're getting 550km out of a tank, you're doing pretty good.
Read here for further fuel economy hints.
Agree with jfarsang: if you're putting in less-than or about 60 litres per fill-up, and you're getting 550km out of a tank, you're doing pretty good.
Read here for further fuel economy hints.
JPL
I still miss my '94 Pajero!
I still miss my '94 Pajero!
- thedjjack
- Posts: 2025
- Joined: Wed Jan 27, 2010 12:13 am
- Member's Photo Album: ucp.php?i=164
- Vehicle: 1989 L300 HITOP!!
- Location: Port McNeill
- Location: Port McNeill
- Contact:
Re: fuel economy
mararmeisto wrote:For a 2-tonne, 4WD, brick-shaped bus, 550km is pretty good. I hope you didn't buy your van from some clown who told you it was going to get 25-30mpg!
[/url]
hey I getting 25mpg (9.5L/100km) very happy with it! But with my little tank hardly ever get over 400km (mind you I like to keep the tank full in a diesel).
-
- Posts: 1671
- Joined: Thu Jun 19, 2008 11:28 pm
- Member's Photo Album: http://dinoevo.de
- Vehicle: -
- Location: -
- Contact:
Re: fuel economy
well, that's the downside of our 5spd. better milage, but shorter range. time to upgrade the Diesel tank :)thedjjack wrote:hey I getting 25mpg (9.5L/100km) very happy with it! But with my little tank hardly ever get over 400km (mind you I like to keep the tank full in a diesel).mararmeisto wrote:For a 2-tonne, 4WD, brick-shaped bus, 550km is pretty good. I hope you didn't buy your van from some clown who told you it was going to get 25-30mpg!
[/url]
-
- Posts: 99
- Joined: Fri Feb 29, 2008 1:45 pm
- Member's Photo Album: http://www.delica.ca/Photos/
- Vehicle: '92 Exceed P35W
- Location: Victoria
Re: fuel economy
mararmeisto wrote:some clown who told you it was going to get 25-30mpg!
Mirror says not a clown (tho red nose...so must be xmas timethedjjack wrote:hey I getting 25mpg (9.5L/100km)

But, then....
...it's a 5spd
...and I don't drive like a clown
...and I'm in Canada, eh, so for reasons best described here: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Comparison ... nt_systems
...I speak in mpIg (miles per Imperial gallon) when need be.
Anyway, tired of this approx. 1/5th volume difference between US vs. Imp. gallons causing misunderstandings (9.5l/100km = 25 miles per US gallon)....so can we Puhleeese speaky metric only on this subject (so we only have to deal with the confusion of some referring to L/100kms and others to KMs/Litre

- FalcoColumbarius
- Site Admin
- Posts: 5983
- Joined: Tue Jan 22, 2008 1:55 pm
- Member's Photo Album: http://www.delica.ca/Photos/index.php?cat=11103
- Vehicle: Delica; Chamonix GLX ('92 P25W)
- Location: North Van, BC, eh?
Re: fuel economy
The Miss Lil' Bitchi gets 32.7 miles per gallon (Cdn) on the open highway and 24.17 typical miles per gallon (Cdn) in the city.
Falco.
Falco.
Sent from my smart pad, using a pen.
Seek Beauty...
Good Ship Miss Lil' Bitchi
...... Vision without action is a daydream. Action without vision is a nightmare. ~ Japanese Proverb
Seek Beauty...
...... Vision without action is a daydream. Action without vision is a nightmare. ~ Japanese Proverb