Mr. Flibble wrote:
I am going to go with Green 1 on this one. When I did my SAR Rope Rescue training they pointed out that part of the bends on the bowline were technically tighter than that of the Figure 8. SAR training was anal enough that when you tied in with a figure 8 follow through you had to tie the tail of the figure 8 to the main rope with a double overhand knot to prevent slippage!....
They changed their minds on that one- here in BC anyhow...
Mr. Flibble wrote:Yes, I know a figure 8 won't slip, but not the point, these are SAR rules we are talking about. You could never use anything made of aluminum, everything had to be steel. No dynamic ropes allowed - only static. 2 ropes for each team member on a line!....
Also changed, the steel is used for durability (especially if you drop hardware) but as long as the piece of gear meets the load reqs, it's OK, the dynamic ropes-- well that would be scary-- imagine pulling on a raising system and having nothing move until you "stretched the elastic" far enough and SPROING!!! And we do still use two ropes, but not for every person- we use 2 person loads (600lbs)
Mr. Flibble wrote:The redundancy built into all that stuff was insane. ....
That's still true! We do all our calculations based on an individual weighing 300lbs and built for 2-person loads, and then use a minimum 10:1 safety factor, so basically the weakest, puniest part of a system still has to meet a 6000lb minimum breaking strength. If you consider the manufactuerer probably adds a furhter 10:1...